From: Till Immanuel Patzschke <tip@inw.de>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Q] Which kernel + special patches ???
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:24:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DE5D2AD.72686009@inw.de> (raw)
Dear list,
following this list for quite a while now raised the above question. To get
more specific:
Given an SMP system with many thousand processes and a potentially high network
and IO load, what is the best combination of source and patch, to make best use
of SMP, keep load low and throughput high?
Is it 2.4.x + rmap or aa or O(1) or ac or some combination
OR ist it 2.5.x + one (or more) of the above patches ???
Many thanks for the help and Happy Thanksgiving!
Immanuel
next reply other threads:[~2002-11-28 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-28 8:24 Till Immanuel Patzschke [this message]
2002-11-28 16:46 ` [Q] Which kernel + special patches ??? Robert Love
2002-12-02 20:20 ` Hanna Linder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DE5D2AD.72686009@inw.de \
--to=tip@inw.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox