Re: DAC960 at 2.5.50

Re: DAC960 at 2.5.50

[Kevin Brosius]

> Samium Gromoff...
> > <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> >         [PATCH] update to OSDL DAC960 driver
> >
> >         Its not perfect but it works
>    is it supposed to blow my data, or is it relatively safe to use?

There have been a few poeple using this patch for about 5 versions of
2.5 so far.  I haven't done heavy testing myself, just booting and doing
some other testing of modules and drivers.  I am running the DAC960 on
my root/boot filesystem and haven't seen any problems yet.

-- 
Kevin

Re: DAC960 at 2.5.50

[Samium Gromoff]

 > Samium Gromoff...
> > > <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> > >         [PATCH] update to OSDL DAC960 driver
> > >
> > >         Its not perfect but it works
> >    is it supposed to blow my data, or is it relatively safe to use?
>
> There have been a few poeple using this patch for about 5 versions of
> 2.5 so far.  I haven't done heavy testing myself, just booting and doing
> some other testing of modules and drivers.  I am running the DAC960 on
> my root/boot filesystem and haven't seen any problems yet.
  thank you. i`ll join the 2.5 DAC user crowd soon then :-)

---
regards,
   Samium Gromoff
_____________________________________

Re: DAC960 at 2.5.50

[Dave Olien]

Let me know if you find any problems at all.  I'll try to
address them.

I think the biggest "imperfection" is just the coding style of
the whole driver.  I might submit some patches over time to clean
up coding style.

The next problem is that it doesn't handle media errors yet.
If you have a read or write failure because a sector on your disk
is bad, it fails the entire read or write. With all the coalescing
of requests that the block layer does, this might fail ALL of a
really large transfer just because one sector is bad.

I'm working on a patch that retries failures section at a time,
so that the failure will be more closely limited to the sector 
that is bad.


On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 06:56:22PM +0300, Samium Gromoff wrote:
>  > Samium Gromoff...
> > > > <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> > > >         [PATCH] update to OSDL DAC960 driver
> > > >
> > > >         Its not perfect but it works
> > >    is it supposed to blow my data, or is it relatively safe to use?
> >
> > There have been a few poeple using this patch for about 5 versions of
> > 2.5 so far.  I haven't done heavy testing myself, just booting and doing
> > some other testing of modules and drivers.  I am running the DAC960 on
> > my root/boot filesystem and haven't seen any problems yet.
>   thank you. i`ll join the 2.5 DAC user crowd soon then :-)
> 
> ---
> regards,
>    Samium Gromoff
> _____________________________________
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: DAC960 at 2.5.50

[Samium Gromoff]

> Let me know if you find any problems at all.  I'll try to
> address them.

  Actually the thing (DAC960-PL, one ibm 10k rpm drive) just booted up and
worked like a charm. Indeed it`s not a hardcore setup, yet i`m happy
anyway :-)

  Although i`ll keep running 2.4 until alsa isapnp breakage will get fixed up.

  Anyhow thank you for the finally working driver which finally enabled me
to check bloody 2.5 at home :-)

regards, Samium Gromoff

DAC960 at 2.5.50

[Samium Gromoff]

> <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
>         [PATCH] update to OSDL DAC960 driver
>
>         Its not perfect but it works
   is it supposed to blow my data, or is it relatively safe to use?

---
regards,
   Samium Gromoff
___________________________
___________________________________