From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:20:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:20:17 -0500 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([66.45.37.187]:1413 "HELO lucidpixels.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:20:15 -0500 Message-ID: <3DF0B3E2.8060104@lucidpixels.com> Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 09:27:46 -0500 From: jpiszcz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jozsef Kadlecsik CC: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Linux Kernel Mailinglist Subject: Re: [Fwd: Question with printk warnings in ip_conntrack with 2.4.20.] References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sure: http://installkernel.tripod.com/tcpdump.log.bz2 Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: >On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, jpiszcz wrote: > > > >>Stange? I am just using vcheck (perl script) that goes out and checks >>out software for the latest versions. >> >> > >If the script uses active mode FTP and when that is refused by the server >reverts back to passive mode, that is a natural explanation for such log >entries. > >Could you record by tcpdump at least one such FTP session? > > > >>Will there possibly be a /proc or kernel config option for warnings such >>as these? >> >> > >In my opinion a new directory tree /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter is >required so that tuning options could be easily added to the system. >But that implies backward (in)compatibily issues... > >Regards, >Jozsef >- >E-mail : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec@sunserv.kfki.hu >PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt >Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics > H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary > > > > >