From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261321AbSLPXa5>; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:30:57 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261349AbSLPXa5>; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:30:57 -0500
Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:52458 "EHLO packet.digeo.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S261321AbSLPXa4>;
	Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:30:56 -0500
Message-ID: <3DFE63D3.B4D3308B@digeo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:37:55 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.51 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>,
       Paolo Ciarrocchi <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [Benchmark] AIM9 results
References: <20021216225257.5871.qmail@linuxmail.org> <3DFE5D3B.4030402@namesys.com> <3DFE60EC.3DDA2669@digeo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Dec 2002 23:38:46.0758 (UTC) FILETIME=[470FB060:01C2A55C]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> Hans Reiser wrote:
> >
> > Andrew and Chris, are these changes in performance definitely due to VM
> > changes (and not some difference I am not thinking of between 2.5 and
> > 2.4 reiserfs code)?
> >
> 
> aim9 is just doing
> 
>         for (lots)
>                 close(creat(filename))
                  unlink(filename);	/* of course */