Re: [2.5.53] So sloowwwww......

Andrew S. Johnson
2003-01-02T07:18:13Z

Paul Rolland wrote:
> Well, I did made another kernel without ACPI and with APM,
> and it is working fine.

Did you try using acpi=no-idle in your kernel append line (if using
lilo) and see what difference that makes? It works in 2.4.

Andy Johnson

>
> To summarize :
> - ACPI Enumeration only is fine
> - More functionnalities from ACPI is bad.
>
> If someone has an idea and wants me to make tests, please contact
> me...
>
> Regards,
> Paul