From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.name>
Cc: Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@mulix.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: question on context of kfree_skb()
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 10:31:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E116407.6040802@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200212310157.06624.oliver@neukum.name>
Oliver Neukum wrote:
>Am Montag, 30. Dezember 2002 23:32 schrieb Manfred Spraul:
>
>
>>Mulix wrote:
>>
>>
>>>dev_kfree_skb_any() should be called when you could be either
>>>executing in interrupt context or not.
>>>
>>>
>>dev_kfree_skb_any() can misdetect the context: You must not use the
>>function if you hold an irq spinlock and you might be running from BH or
>>process context.
>>
>>
>
>What then shall be used under these circumstances ?
>Could you perhaps summarise the issue ?
>
>
When a packet is freed, the upper layers must be notified, for example a
user space process could be waiting for socket buffer space. This can
happen either immediately, or in the next softirq.
dev_kfree_skb_irq() is always ok, although slower than the other
functions. The packet is unconditionally queued and processed later.
dev_kfree_skb_any() tries to optimize it a bit: If it thinks that it's
save to process it now, then the packet is processed immediately. The
autodetection is usually correct, except for the special case I
mentioned. Drivers must work around that.
dev_kfree_skb() always processes the packet immediately. Only permitted
from bottom half context or from process context.
--
Manfred
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-31 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-30 22:32 question on context of kfree_skb() Manfred Spraul
2002-12-31 0:57 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-12-31 9:31 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-30 18:32 Oliver Neukum
2002-12-30 22:26 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E116407.6040802@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mulix@mulix.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox