From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:02:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:02:48 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:3337 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:02:47 -0500 Message-ID: <3E14C6D4.1040506@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:10:12 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Geert Uytterhoeven CC: Tomas Szepe , Linus Torvalds , zaitcev@redhat.com, "David S. Miller" , Linux Kernel Development , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Linux/m68k , netfilter-devel@lists.samba.org, phillim2@comcast.net, Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] Multiarch kconfig cleanup References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > linux-m68k: Should we kill CONFIG_NE2K_ZORRO, or kill CONFIG_ARIADNE2 and > rename the driver to ne2k-zorro.c? I'm not linux-m68k, but let me add my small voice in preference to the latter, using ne2k-zorro as the name across the board. If I had my druthers, I would s/pcnet_cs/ne2k_cs/ too... hmmmmmm :)