From: "David D. Hagood" <wowbagger@sktc.net>
To: Wolfgang Fritz <wolfgang.fritz@gmx.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Asterisk] DTMF noise
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 06:51:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E1D705E.1030203@sktc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E1C4872.7080508@gmx.net>
Wolfgang Fritz wrote:
> Maybe it would be better to reenable harmonic checks but comparing
> harmonic levels to the level of the fundamental instead of using
> absolute values as in the present implementation.
You mean the code DOESN'T normalize the signal to the total energy
first?!?!? YEEP!
The very FIRST thing you do is compute the total signal energy in the
sample period, trivially reject if Etotal < MinETotal, then normalize
all other signal energies to Etotal - that is a basic tenant of DSP.
> standard test procedure with a lot of test cases which are not available
> to mortal humans (audio tapes from Bellcore IIRC)
I think we may have the test cases as WAVs at work, and I think they are
freely distributable - I'll kick a reminder to my work account off to
check later today.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-09 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030107140012$1b66@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030107150006$4896@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-01-07 19:08 ` [Asterisk] DTMF noise Thomas Tonino
2003-01-07 22:46 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2003-01-08 7:51 ` Thomas Tonino
2003-01-08 12:43 ` David D. Hagood
2003-01-08 13:04 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-01-08 15:49 ` Wolfgang Fritz
2003-01-08 16:30 ` Wolfgang Fritz
2003-01-08 19:48 ` Andrew McGregor
2003-01-08 22:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-09 12:51 ` David D. Hagood [this message]
2003-01-09 13:31 ` Wolfgang Fritz
2003-01-09 23:32 ` David D. Hagood
2003-01-10 6:52 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-01-10 12:42 ` David D. Hagood
2003-01-10 12:03 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2003-01-08 20:22 ` Thomas Tonino
2003-01-09 12:42 ` David D. Hagood
2003-01-07 13:55 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2003-01-07 14:49 ` [Asterisk] " Mark Spencer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E1D705E.1030203@sktc.net \
--to=wowbagger@sktc.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wolfgang.fritz@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox