From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 14:06:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 14:06:54 -0500 Received: from 12-237-170-171.client.attbi.com ([12.237.170.171]:5971 "EHLO wf-rch.cirr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 14:06:54 -0500 Message-ID: <3E1DCA8D.4040005@acm.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 13:16:29 -0600 From: Corey Minyard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] PATCH: IPMI driver References: <200301090332.h093WML05981@hera.kernel.org> <20030109164407.GA26195@codemonkey.org.uk> <1042135594.27796.37.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030109172229.GA27288@codemonkey.org.uk> <1042135971.27796.44.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: >On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 17:22, Dave Jones wrote: > > >>On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 06:06:34PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: >> >> > Arghhh I was told Linus accepted it, and my tree indexer found "IPMI" so >> > decided it was present too. (Only the i2c definitions apparently). >> >>Shouldn't cause any problems in 2.4 anyways should it ? >>After all, its 'just another driver'. >> >> > Oh well, it should be in 2.5 >> >>Added to the queue of bits from the 2.4 changesets list that I'm >>intending to push to Linus soon. >> >> > >Pull the 2.5 port from openipmi.sourceforge.net saves you doing the port >yourself. > Definately pull the 2.5 port from there, as there are some differences between the 2.4 and 2.5 versions. -Corey