From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:19:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:18:38 -0500 Received: from amsfep11-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.20]:9279 "EHLO amsfep11-int.chello.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:18:33 -0500 Message-ID: <3E21CFA1.7020607@users.sf.net> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:27:13 +0100 From: Thomas Tonino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Love CC: linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support References: <20030112194008$7d7e@gated-at.bofh.it> <20030112202011$498d@gated-at.bofh.it> In-Reply-To: <20030112202011$498d@gated-at.bofh.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert Love wrote: > I was thinking the same thing, but the lame name of the chips held me > back - the new Celerons are also called "Celerons". > > Regardless, I updated the comments and I call the new Celerons "P4-based > Celerons" which should be descriptive enough. Would a reference to clock frequency be useful? It seems the old Celeron went up to 1200 MHz, and the P4 Celeron started at 1700 MHz. Thomas