Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

John Levon
2003-01-13T22:35:51Z

On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:14:52AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:

> >But still requiring up-apic, or smp with apic, right?
>
> nmi_watchdog=2 - uses performance counters, not apic.

which requires a local APIC to set up NMI delivery mode like Jens said

regards
john

--
Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person,
the thread is over.