Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

Emiliano Gabrielli
2003-01-12T23:30:58Z

<quote who="Rob Wilkens">
> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:52, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:34:58PM -0500, Rob Wilkens wrote:
>> > You're wrong. You wouldn't have to jump over them any more than you have to jump
>> over the "goto" statement.
>>
>> The goto is a conditional jump. You propose replacing it with a
>> conditional jump past the error handling code predicated on the
>> opposite condition. Where's the improvement?
>
> The goto is absolutely not a conditional jump. The if that precedes it is
> conditional. The goto is not. The if is already there.
>
> -Rob

Oh my God ... really you are the only one on this list not to understand that hi has
mispelled ?!?

Now I understand the reason of your trollness !!

--
Emiliano Gabrielli

dip. di Fisica
2° Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"