public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Biro <rossb@google.com>
To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: [2.4.21-pre3] IDE error recovery
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:08:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E2443FF.1030101@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.10.10301132318090.18906-100000@master.linux-ide.org


I knew this was going to be a problem.

ATA-6 no longer allows a device to claim ATA-2 compatibility.  The bit 
is obsolete.
ATA-3 does not allow IDLE IMMEDIATE.  We need to changre the error 
recovery depending on which bits are set.

ATA-6 => use srst
ATA-2 => idle immediate

Anything else is probably srst as well.

One of the drives that has trouble claims ATA-2 through ATA-6, which is 
interesting,  This means this device claims to support ATA-5, hence we 
should be able to interpret the bits in the Identify device according to 
ATA-5 which means it supports ATA-2 which it clearly does not.   Only 1 
of the 3 different drives I've looked at gets it right and does not 
claim ATA-2 support when it does not support it.  I'll drop an email to 
a couple of manufacturers and let them know their drives have a problem.

    Ross


Andre Hedrick wrote:

>Whoa, you need to check whic spec you are refering to first.
>
> Model=FUJITSU MHJ2181AT, FwRev=D034, SerialNo=01001697
> Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
> RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
> BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=512kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
> CurCHS=17475/15/63, CurSects=-78446341, LBA=yes, LBAsects=35433216
> IORDY=yes, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
> PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
> DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4
> AdvancedPM=yes: disabled (255)
> Drive Supports : Reserved : ATA-2 ATA-3 ATA-4 ATA-5
> Kernel Drive Geometry LogicalCHS=2205/255/63 PhysicalCHS=37495/15/63
>
>This drive claims ATA2-5 support, and thus it accepts the status quo.
>Where are you finding the violations?
>If the drive vendor states a range of support they are in violation.
>This is clearly the point where the driver core needs to have a
>
>	unsinged long drive->support_bits
>
>The mess this is going to create.
>
>Cheers,
>
>On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ross Biro wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Take this patch with a big grain of salt.
>>
>>The current IDE error recovery code will send a IDLEIMMEDIATE in the 
>>case when a drive is still busy or has drq set during an error.  This is 
>>a violation of the ATA spec and hoses up quite a few drives.  The 
>>prefered form of error recovery seems to be a soft reset followed by a 
>>set features.  This patch replaces the IDLEIMMEDIATE with a reset, but 
>>does not do the set features.  The set features should not be necessary, 
>>but at least one drive vendor does most of their testing with the set 
>>features.  OK_TO_RESET_CONTROLLER must be set to 1 if this patch is applied.
>>
>>I've modified the google kernel to add a desired_speed to ide_drive_t 
>>and check to see if current_speed != desired_speed before every read or 
>>write request.  This causes a set features after a reset.  I can provide 
>>patches to do something similiar for 2.4.21, but I'm not sure it's 
>>appropriate.  There are bugs in the way hdparm -X is handled in 2.4.20, 
>>and this patch would fix them as well, but it may be too large of a 
>>patch for a stable kernel.
>>
>>This also fixes drive_cmd_intr to do a little better checking to make 
>>sure the device is ready.  The spec requires this, but any device that 
>>sends an interrupt before it's ready is probably broken.
>>
>>I have no idea what impact this will have on older devices or non disks.
>>
>>This patch has only been minimally tested.
>>
>>----- snip -------
>>diff -durbB linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c 
>>linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
>>--- linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c    Wed Jan  8 16:25:04 2003
>>+++ linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c    Thu Jan  9 11:38:22 2003
>>@@ -644,7 +644,11 @@
>>     }
>>     if (HWIF(drive)->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG) & (BUSY_STAT|DRQ_STAT)) {
>>         /* force an abort */
>>-        HWIF(drive)->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG);
>>+                /* This violates the ATA Spec and causes trouble for
>>+                   many modern hard drives.  I'm not sure if it is 
>>necessary
>>+                   for older devices or even modern cd-roms. -- RAB
>>+                   HWIF(drive)->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG); */
>>+                rq->errors |= ERROR_RESET;
>>         }
>>     if (rq->errors >= ERROR_MAX) {
>>         DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 0);
>>diff -durbB linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 
>>linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c
>>--- linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c    Wed Jan  8 16:25:17 2003
>>+++ linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c    Thu Jan  9 11:40:20 2003
>>@@ -943,7 +943,11 @@
>>     }
>>     if (hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG) & (BUSY_STAT|DRQ_STAT)) {
>>         /* force an abort */
>>-        hwif->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG);
>>+                /* This violates the ATA Spec and causes trouble for
>>+                   many modern hard drives.  I'm not sure if it is 
>>necessary
>>+                   for older devices or even other modern devices. -- RAB
>>+                   hwif->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG); */
>>+                rq->errors |= ERROR_RESET;
>>     }
>>     if (rq->errors >= ERROR_MAX)
>>         DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 0);
>>diff -durbB linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-io.c 
>>linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>>--- linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-io.c    Wed Jan  8 16:25:37 2003
>>+++ linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-io.c    Mon Jan 13 18:01:52 2003
>>@@ -328,7 +328,12 @@
>>     }
>>     if (hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG) & (BUSY_STAT|DRQ_STAT)) {
>>         /* force an abort */
>>+                /* This violates the ATA Spec and causes trouble for
>>+                   many modern hard drives.  I'm not sure if it is 
>>necessary
>>+                   for older devices or even other modern ata devices 
>>-- RAB
>>         hwif->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG);
>>+                */
>>+                rq->errors |= ERROR_RESET;
>>     }
>>     if (rq->errors >= ERROR_MAX) {
>>         if (drive->driver != NULL)
>>@@ -397,18 +402,63 @@
>>     struct request *rq = HWGROUP(drive)->rq;
>>     ide_hwif_t *hwif = HWIF(drive);
>>     u8 *args = (u8 *) rq->buffer;
>>-    u8 stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG);
>>+    u8 stat;
>>     int retries = 10;
>> 
>>+        /* The ATA-6 spec requires a 400ns wait when entering the
>>+           HPIOI1: Check_status State from the HI4 state.  We should
>>+           only get here coming from the HPIOI0 INTRQ_wait state, but
>>+           better safe than sorry.  The spec also says a read of the
>>+           alt status register accomplishes this wait. */
>>+    if (IDE_CONTROL_REG)
>>+        (void)hwif->INB(IDE_ALTSTATUS_REG);
>>+    else
>>+                ide_delay_400ns();
>>+
>>+        /* The ATA-6 spec says that the should enter the check status
>>+           state when it get's an interrupt for a drive command, so
>>+           technically, the device can send an interrupt before it has
>>+           finished.  I would consider any device that does this to be
>>+           broken, but the spec allows it. --RAB 1/10/03 */
>>+    stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG);
>>+        if (stat & BUSY_STAT) {
>>+                /* We are just supposed to poll from here on out. */
>>+                if (HWGROUP(drive)->poll_timeout == 0) {
>>+                        
>>HWGROUP(drive)->poll_timeout=WAIT_CMD/CMD_POLL_TICKS;
>>+                } else if (--HWGROUP(drive)->poll_timeout == 0) {
>>+                        return DRIVER(drive)->error(drive,
>>+                                                    "drive_cmd timeout",
>>+                                                    stat);
>>+                }
>>+                ide_set_handler(drive, drive_cmd_intr, CMD_POLL_TICKS, 
>>NULL);
>>+                return ide_started;
>>+        }
>>+
>>     local_irq_enable();
>>-    if ((stat & DRQ_STAT) && args && args[3]) {
>>+
>>+        /* We want to make sure that the device and the command
>>+           both agree on wether or not data is returned by the command
>>+           that was just issued.  If they do not, it is an error. */
>>+        if (args && args[3]) {
>>         u8 io_32bit = drive->io_32bit;
>>+                /* The software expects some data back.  If the drive does
>>+                   not, then it is an error. */
>>+                if (!(stat & DRQ_STAT)) {
>>+                        return DRIVER(drive)->error(drive, "drive_cmd 
>>no data", stat);
>>+                }
>>         drive->io_32bit = 0;
>>         hwif->ata_input_data(drive, &args[4], args[3] * SECTOR_WORDS);
>>         drive->io_32bit = io_32bit;
>>         while (((stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG)) & BUSY_STAT) && 
>>retries--)
>>             udelay(100);
>>+        } else {
>>+                /* The software does not expect data, so if the drive
>>+                   returns some, then it's an error. */
>>+                if (stat & DRQ_STAT) {
>>+                        return DRIVER(drive)->error(drive, "drive_cmd 
>>unexpected data", stat);
>>+                }
>>     }
>>+
>> 
>>     if (!OK_STAT(stat, READY_STAT, BAD_STAT))
>>         return DRIVER(drive)->error(drive, "drive_cmd", stat);
>>diff -durbB linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c 
>>linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c
>>--- linux-2.4.20-p1/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c    Wed Jan  8 16:25:43 2003
>>+++ linux-2.4.20-p2/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c    Fri Jan 10 11:19:07 2003
>>@@ -485,7 +485,13 @@
>>     }
>>     if (hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG) & (BUSY_STAT|DRQ_STAT)) {
>>         /* force an abort */
>>-        hwif->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE, IDE_COMMAND_REG);
>>+                /* This violates the ATA Spec and causes trouble for
>>+                   many modern hard drives.  I'm not sure if it is 
>>necessary
>>+                   for older devices or even other modern ata devices 
>>-- RAB
>>+        hwif->OUTB(WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE,IDE_COMMAND_REG);
>>+                */
>>+                rq->errors |= ERROR_RESET;
>>+
>>     }
>>     if (rq->errors >= ERROR_MAX) {
>>         DRIVER(drive)->end_request(drive, 0);
>>diff -durbB linux-2.4.20-p1/include/linux/ide.h 
>>linux-2.4.20-p2/include/linux/ide.h
>>--- linux-2.4.20-p1/include/linux/ide.h    Thu Jan  9 15:37:22 2003
>>+++ linux-2.4.20-p2/include/linux/ide.h    Mon Jan 13 18:04:47 2003
>>@@ -271,6 +271,10 @@
>> #define WAIT_WORSTCASE    (30*HZ)    /* 30sec  - worst case when 
>>spinning up */
>> #define WAIT_CMD    (10*HZ)    /* 10sec  - maximum wait for an IRQ to 
>>happen */
>> #define WAIT_MIN_SLEEP    (2*HZ/100)    /* 20msec - minimum sleep time */
>>+#define CMD_POLL_TICKS  (1)     /* How long to wait in ticks between
>>+                                   status checks for a drive cmd
>>+                                   that set it's interrupt before it
>>+                                   was complete. */
>> 
>> #define HOST(hwif,chipset)                    \
>> {                                \
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Andre Hedrick
>LAD Storage Consulting Group
>
>  
>




  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-14 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-14  2:39 PATCH: [2.4.21-pre3] IDE error recovery Ross Biro
2003-01-14  3:44 ` Ross Biro
2003-01-14  7:23 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-14 17:08   ` Ross Biro [this message]
2003-01-14 17:36     ` Ross Biro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E2443FF.1030101@google.com \
    --to=rossb@google.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox