* [DUMB]: Is kernel oops always a kernel bug ???
@ 2003-01-17 6:03 Linux Geek
2003-01-17 6:14 ` Jurriaan
2003-01-17 6:18 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Linux Geek @ 2003-01-17 6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi all ,
If a kernel oops, then is the problem always with the kernel ? Can't a
user proggie ( running as root ) do something insane and make the
kernel oops ?
TIA
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [DUMB]: Is kernel oops always a kernel bug ???
2003-01-17 6:03 [DUMB]: Is kernel oops always a kernel bug ??? Linux Geek
@ 2003-01-17 6:14 ` Jurriaan
2003-01-17 6:18 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jurriaan @ 2003-01-17 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Geek; +Cc: linux-kernel
From: Linux Geek <bourne@ToughGuy.net>
Date: Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:33:46AM +0530
> Hi all ,
>
> If a kernel oops, then is the problem always with the kernel ? Can't a
> user proggie ( running as root ) do something insane and make the
> kernel oops ?
>
That shouldn't happen - it's called DOS (Denial-Of-Service) if a user
program can make the kernel oops. Some of these probably still exist in
the linux kernel, nothing is perfect :-)
But another option exists: hardware failures. If your memory decides to
take a break, you will get an oops also.
Good luck,
Jurriaan
--
Holed up in your little room, we talk for hour on empty hour,
pacing up and down between the walls that we have built ourselves.
New Model Army - Long Goodbye
GNU/Linux 2.5.58 SMP/ReiserFS 2x2752 bogomips load av: 0.16 0.61 0.61
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [DUMB]: Is kernel oops always a kernel bug ???
2003-01-17 6:03 [DUMB]: Is kernel oops always a kernel bug ??? Linux Geek
2003-01-17 6:14 ` Jurriaan
@ 2003-01-17 6:18 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Valdis.Kletnieks @ 2003-01-17 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Geek; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1134 bytes --]
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:33:46 +0530, Linux Geek <bourne@ToughGuy.net> said:
> If a kernel oops, then is the problem always with the kernel ? Can't a
> user proggie ( running as root ) do something insane and make the
> kernel oops ?
At least in theory, there should be *nothing* that can happen in user space
that will kill the kernel. However, in practice, if a program is running
as root, it can definitely blortch things up. This is mostly due to the
assumption that the root user has a clue, and that if they are (for instance)
opening /proc/kcore for writing, that they know what they're doing. Similarly,
if a program opens /dev/hda1 for writing and scribbles over the superblock,
it may be a bit difficult to mount the filesystem.
So in general, yes, the root user can screw things up in the kernel. On the
other hand, the root user can also 'rm -rf /' which doesn't require any
extraordinary kernel assistance, just the unlink() system call. The only
solution here is to not give root to clueless bozos, and to take regular
backups. ;)
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-17 6:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-17 6:03 [DUMB]: Is kernel oops always a kernel bug ??? Linux Geek
2003-01-17 6:14 ` Jurriaan
2003-01-17 6:18 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox