From: Brian King <brking@charter.net>
To: James Stevenson <james@stev.org>
Cc: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOPS in idescsi_end_request
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 07:39:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E314224.3030405@charter.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00b601c2c387$ebc51c00$0cfea8c0@ezdsp.com>
James Stevenson wrote:
> [LARGE SNIP]
>
>
>>Would you agree to test the patch (possibly next week).
>
>
> yeah sure.
>
I would be happy to test it as well.
-Brian
>
>
>>cheers
>>
>>-andrey
>>
>>
>>>>If you can reliably reproduce the problem you could give it a try.
>>>>
>>>>Anybody sees yet another race condition here? :))
>>>>
>>>>-andrey
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>While burning a CD tonight I ended up taking an oops on my system. I
>
> had
>
>>>>>the lkcd patch applied to my 2.4.19 kernel, so I was able to look at
>
> the
>
>>>>> oops after my system rebooted. After digging into it a little and
>>>>>looking at the ide-scsi code I think I found the problem but am not
>>>>>sure. How can idescsi_reset simply return SCSI_RESET_SUCCESS to the
>
> scsi
>
>>>>>mid layer? I think what is happening is that a command times out,
>>>>>idescsi_abort is called, which returns SCSI_ABORT_SNOOZE. Later on
>>>>>idescsi_reset gets called, which returns SCSI_RESET_SUCCESS. At this
>>>>>point the scsi mid-layer owns the scsi_cmnd and returns the failure
>
> back
>
>>>>>up the chain. Later on, the command gets run through
>>>>>idescsi_end_request, which then tries to access the scsi_cmnd
>
> structure
>
>>>>>which is it no longer owns.
>>>>>
>>>>>Any help is appreciated. I have a complete lkcd dump of the failure if
>>>>>anyone would like more information...
>>>>>
>
>
>
>
--
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-24 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-23 8:52 OOPS in idescsi_end_request Andrey Borzenkov
2003-01-23 9:19 ` Strong kernel lock with linux-2.5.59 : futex in Huge Pages dada1
2003-01-23 9:41 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-24 3:15 ` OOPS in idescsi_end_request Brian King
2003-01-24 6:21 ` Re[2]: " Andrey Borzenkov
2003-01-24 9:06 ` James Stevenson
2003-01-24 13:39 ` Brian King [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-22 3:41 Brian King
2003-01-22 21:49 ` James Stevenson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E314224.3030405@charter.net \
--to=brking@charter.net \
--cc=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
--cc=james@stev.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox