From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:47:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:47:32 -0500 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:2745 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:47:31 -0500 Message-ID: <3E3A8077.9050409@namesys.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:56:07 +0300 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Con Kolivas CC: linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest References: <200302010020.34119.conman@kolivas.net> <3E3A7C22.1080709@namesys.com> <200302010040.49141.conman@kolivas.net> In-Reply-To: <200302010040.49141.conman@kolivas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Try running with the -E option for gcc, it might be less CPU intensive, and thus a better FS benchmark. What do you think? -- Hans