From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 23:56:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 23:56:53 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([63.209.29.3]:64163 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 23:56:52 -0500 Message-ID: <3E433EBC.5000202@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 21:06:04 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020828 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , Russell King Subject: Re: [RFC] klibc for 2.5.59 bk References: <20030207045919.GA30526@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks to Arnd Bergmann, it looks like the klibc and initramfs code is > now working. I've created a patch against Linus's latest bk tree and > put it at: > http://www.kroah.com/linux/klibc/klibc-2.5.59-2.patch.gz > (I can't get to kernel.org right now, sorry) > and there's a bk tree at: > bk://kernel.bkbits.net/gregkh/linux/klibc-2.5 > > I'd really like to send this to Linus now, but I'm going to be away > from email for about a week, so I'll wait will I get back. If anyone > has any issues with this patch, please let me know. > That's good, that'll give me a chance to check through it. What klibc is this based on? -hpa