public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jpiszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Evil bug in netfilter/kernel 2.4.x?
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:32:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E482899.9070906@lucidpixels.com> (raw)

http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html
"As a secondary note, if you use connection tracking you will not see 
any fragmented packets, since they are dealt with before hitting any 
chain or table in iptables."

PROBLEM:

root@p300:/etc/rc.d# iptables -t filter -I INPUT -f -j LOG --log-level 3 
--log-prefix "FRAG: "
root@p300:/etc/rc.d# iptables -I INPUT -f -j LOG --log-level 3 
--log-prefix "FRAG: "
root@p300:/etc/rc.d# iptables -I INPUT -f -j LOG --log-level 3 
--log-prefix "FRAG: "
root@p300:/etc/rc.d# iptables -I INPUT -f -j DROP

I've tried all of these, each one by itself.

However, when I run tcpdump, I can clearly see these are not getting 
dropped or logged by the kernel.

I like conn_track for DCC/FTP connections, however, to get logging & 
dropping of fragmented packets working properly, I must recompile 
without the conn_tracker's?

Wouldn't this be considered as a bug?  Someone could be 
pounding/scanning you with fragmented packets, and you would never see 
it, as many people run the DCC and/or FTP connection trackers!

box1# nmap -sS -P0 -f -p 1-65535 box2.com

17:11:52.659286 box1.com > box2.com: (frag 2729:4@16)
17:11:52.661416 box1.com > box2.com: (frag 986:4@16)
17:11:52.663400 box1.com > box2.com: (frag 61814:4@16)
17:11:52.665398 box1.com > box2.com: (frag 30216:4@16)
17:11:52.667401 box1.com > box2.com: (frag 4100:4@16)
17:11:52.669392 box1.com > box2.com: (frag 61387:4@16)

947 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel

Is it possible in anyway to log/drop/match fragmented packets with 
connection tracking turned on?

Please CC me as I am not on the list.


             reply	other threads:[~2003-02-10 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-10 22:32 jpiszcz [this message]
2003-02-11 12:31 ` Evil bug in netfilter/kernel 2.4.x? Gianni Tedesco
2003-02-11 14:26   ` jpiszcz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E482899.9070906@lucidpixels.com \
    --to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox