From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
To: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@holomorphy.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
suparna@in.ibm.com, Kenneth Sumrall <ken@mvista.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkcd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Kexec, DMA, and SMP
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:00:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E4D4ADF.3070109@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030214164436.H2092@almesberger.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Werner Almesberger wrote:
|Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
|
|>I don't think suspending devices is safe at that stage since removing
|>devices and walking lists and freeing memory and disabling devices and...
|>kicks up quite a storm.
|
|
|If you *really* don't want to stop devices, you can use the
|"reserved, non-DMA memory" approach, kexec the kernel that
|records the crash dump, and then do a system-wide reset, or
|such.
|
|But if you don't have that - possibly considerable - amount
|of memory to spare, you don't have much of a choice than to
|stop devices. Of course, crash dumps don't need a neat and
|clean shutdown, so you can avoid all the kfrees, and such.
|
|(So adding a special mode to the power management code may
|be too much overhead. Besides, sometimes, you can just pull
|a reset line, and don't have to do anything even remotely
|related to power management.)
True, I didn't mean the high-level power management code directly. But the
PCI API defines a suspend operation that could take a special mode for this.
Or maybe a new field in the PCI structure (and equivalent for other
things, if
there are any). But the suspend and resume operations should at least give
a good idea where its needed and how to use it.
- -Corey
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE+TUrdmUvlb4BhfF4RAn2aAJ40Ktn3x6Zygs1RMnAs/HLp5YqtHwCaA3kD
lRNA6aXFagCkjbE87e+DZCw=
=9wf1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-14 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3E448745.9040707@mvista.com>
[not found] ` <m1isvuzjj2.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
2003-02-08 20:18 ` Kexec, DMA, and SMP Corey Minyard
2003-02-09 18:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-10 11:14 ` Kexec on 2.5.59 problems ? Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-10 17:09 ` [Fastboot] " Andy Pfiffer
2003-02-10 18:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-11 7:21 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-11 17:04 ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-02-11 23:46 ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-02-12 4:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-12 22:31 ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-02-13 9:50 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-13 15:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-18 10:59 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-18 15:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-10 12:12 ` Kexec, DMA, and SMP Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-10 13:56 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-10 15:07 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-10 15:22 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-10 17:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-11 1:35 ` Kenneth Sumrall
2003-02-11 5:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-11 17:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-02-11 12:55 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-11 13:40 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-11 14:06 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-11 14:40 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-11 15:20 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-12 4:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-12 14:17 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-12 14:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-12 16:06 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-13 11:13 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-14 3:13 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 14:20 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-14 18:10 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 18:23 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-14 19:26 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-02-14 19:44 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 20:00 ` Corey Minyard [this message]
2003-02-15 6:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-16 16:22 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-16 21:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-17 4:26 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-17 7:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-17 17:32 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-12 4:47 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E4D4ADF.3070109@mvista.com \
--to=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ken@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkcd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=wa@almesberger.net \
--cc=zwane@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox