public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Sullivan <mike.sullivan@alltec.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Scheduling with Hyperthreading
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 02:43:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E5B1EB8.2090601@alltec.com> (raw)



Sorry, should have been more specific. I am referring to the scheduler. 
I have noticed
that if I run two compute intensive jobs on a Dual Xeon, the processes 
run on separate
physical cpus and can spend a significant amount of time with both on a 
single
cpu. I have seen some patches that try to improve on this and was 
wondering if
they have made it into the production kernel stream. I ran tests on a 
2.4.20 kernel and
it had the same problem as a 2.4.18 kernel.


                                                                        
                                    Thanks
                                                                        
                                     Mike

William Lee Irwin III wrote:

>On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Mike Sullivan wrote:
>  
>
>>>What kernel versions will attempt to distribute jobs across physical CPUs on
>>>Xeon SMP configurations.
>>>      
>>>
>
>On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:45:18PM -0700, James Bourne wrote:
>  
>
>>From what I've heard, Arjans' user space daemon might be the way
>>things are going, it's at http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/irqbalance/ .
>>The other way that you might try is the irq load balance patch that Ingo
>>produced.  There is a patch that is from 2.4.20 at
>>http://www.hardrock.org/kernel/2.4.20/ and it is what I'm using at work on
>>our current Xeon systems (until I have the chance to test the user space
>>daemon at least).
>>    
>>
>
>I think he's referring to the cpu scheduler, not interrupt load
>balancing. mingo might have some insight into current patches for
>this and current results thereof. I don't really participate in
>the scheduler aside from very occasional bugfixing.
>
>
>-- wli
>  
>



-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Sullivan                           Director Performance Computing
@lliance Technologies,                  Voice: (416) 385-3255,
18 Wynford Dr, Suite 407                Fax:   (416) 385-1774
Toronto, ON, Canada, M3C-3S2            Toll Free:1-877-216-3199
http://www.alltec.com




             reply	other threads:[~2003-02-25  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-25  7:43 Mike Sullivan [this message]
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302251616300.31810-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2003-02-25 21:23 ` Scheduling with Hyperthreading Mike Sullivan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-25 21:21 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302250852190.26386-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2003-02-25 21:01 ` Mike Sullivan
2003-02-25  1:04 Scheduling with HyperThreading Mike Sullivan
2003-02-25  5:45 ` James Bourne
2003-02-25  5:59   ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E5B1EB8.2090601@alltec.com \
    --to=mike.sullivan@alltec.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox