From: Mike Sullivan <mike.sullivan@alltec.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Scheduling with Hyperthreading
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 02:43:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E5B1EB8.2090601@alltec.com> (raw)
Sorry, should have been more specific. I am referring to the scheduler.
I have noticed
that if I run two compute intensive jobs on a Dual Xeon, the processes
run on separate
physical cpus and can spend a significant amount of time with both on a
single
cpu. I have seen some patches that try to improve on this and was
wondering if
they have made it into the production kernel stream. I ran tests on a
2.4.20 kernel and
it had the same problem as a 2.4.18 kernel.
Thanks
Mike
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Mike Sullivan wrote:
>
>
>>>What kernel versions will attempt to distribute jobs across physical CPUs on
>>>Xeon SMP configurations.
>>>
>>>
>
>On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:45:18PM -0700, James Bourne wrote:
>
>
>>From what I've heard, Arjans' user space daemon might be the way
>>things are going, it's at http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/irqbalance/ .
>>The other way that you might try is the irq load balance patch that Ingo
>>produced. There is a patch that is from 2.4.20 at
>>http://www.hardrock.org/kernel/2.4.20/ and it is what I'm using at work on
>>our current Xeon systems (until I have the chance to test the user space
>>daemon at least).
>>
>>
>
>I think he's referring to the cpu scheduler, not interrupt load
>balancing. mingo might have some insight into current patches for
>this and current results thereof. I don't really participate in
>the scheduler aside from very occasional bugfixing.
>
>
>-- wli
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Sullivan Director Performance Computing
@lliance Technologies, Voice: (416) 385-3255,
18 Wynford Dr, Suite 407 Fax: (416) 385-1774
Toronto, ON, Canada, M3C-3S2 Toll Free:1-877-216-3199
http://www.alltec.com
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-25 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-25 7:43 Mike Sullivan [this message]
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302251616300.31810-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2003-02-25 21:23 ` Scheduling with Hyperthreading Mike Sullivan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-25 21:21 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302250852190.26386-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2003-02-25 21:01 ` Mike Sullivan
2003-02-25 1:04 Scheduling with HyperThreading Mike Sullivan
2003-02-25 5:45 ` James Bourne
2003-02-25 5:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E5B1EB8.2090601@alltec.com \
--to=mike.sullivan@alltec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox