public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Sullivan <mike.sullivan@alltec.com>
To: Mark Hahn <hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Scheduling with Hyperthreading
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:01:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E5BD9A2.6090705@alltec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.44.0302250852190.26386-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca

  Mark

I would to a quick snap with top, and when I saw 99.9% I assumed the the 
process had
been there during the time top was starting up.

Looking at /proc/(pid)/cpu, shows that with two jobs running they are 
sticking to cpu 0 and 1
which are siblings


                                                                        
                                                                        
Regards
                                                                        
                                                                        Mike

Mark Hahn wrote:

>>that if I run two compute intensive jobs on a Dual Xeon, the processes 
>>run on separate
>>physical cpus and can spend a significant amount of time with both on a 
>>single
>>cpu.
>>    
>>
>
>how did you determine this?  running another program, such as top,
>will naturally disturb the scheduler and corrupt any observations.
>the only means I can think of is to look in /proc/<pid>/cpu near
>very infrequently (ideally, just before the processes exit.)
>or is this what you've done?
>  
>

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Sullivan                           Director Performance Computing
@lliance Technologies,                  Voice: (416) 385-3255, 
18 Wynford Dr, Suite 407                Fax:   (416) 385-1774
Toronto, ON, Canada, M3C-3S2            Toll Free:1-877-216-3199
http://www.alltec.com




       reply	other threads:[~2003-02-25 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302250852190.26386-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2003-02-25 21:01 ` Mike Sullivan [this message]
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302251616300.31810-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2003-02-25 21:23 ` Scheduling with Hyperthreading Mike Sullivan
2003-02-25 21:21 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-25  7:43 Mike Sullivan
2003-02-25  1:04 Scheduling with HyperThreading Mike Sullivan
2003-02-25  5:45 ` James Bourne
2003-02-25  5:59   ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E5BD9A2.6090705@alltec.com \
    --to=mike.sullivan@alltec.com \
    --cc=hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox