From: kwijibo@zianet.com
To: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Slowing down disk access?
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:03:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E5FA488.2080208@zianet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030228143528.GA2432@rdlg.net>
I have nearly an identical system as yours. Dual 1.6 Athlons,
two 3ware 7850's, 8 disks on each but with 160 gig drives.
I have kernel 2.4.19 on it with ext3. My RAID is arranged
slightly different however. I have each controller do a RAID 5
and then I software mirror the two. This box gets hammered
pretty hard at times over NFS and other services but I have
never seen this type of behaviour come out of it. Are you
sure one of your drives isn't going bad, it looks the error
is always coming from unit #7. Do all of them do this?
Steve
Robert L. Harris wrote:
> I've got a system I need to slow down disk access on it would seem. The
>syerver, a dual 1.5Ghz Athalon has two 3ware IDE controllers, 8 disks
>each for a total of sixteen 180 Gig disks. This system is laid out in
>four RAID5 arrays that it shares out via NFS. kernel 2.4.19-ac4, ext3
>file systems. I've got 7 of these.
>
> This works great and provides a LOT of cheap disk that we use for
>staging backups before cloning off to tape.
>
> The problem is that when the array's get pounded HARD, such as when
>legato is cleaning it's file devices (nsrstage -C) the machine will lock
>up and spew errors to my console:
>
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
>3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
>
> This requires a hard reboot. If I use the magic keys and reset it then
>it goes down but doesn't come back up properly, usually dieing around
>the LILO area, I believe the array or disks are left in an odd state.
>
> Is there a way to actually slow down the disk access/read/write other
>than re-making the filesystems? On the other systems the chunk size is
>at either 32K or 128K. On this one in particular the chunk size is
>1024K which was determined by running a number of tests (bonnie, nfs
>reads/writes) and was found to be about the fastest for our money's
>worth. The disk hangups didn't appear until just recently. If there's
>no other choise I can leave the disks as read only until the data rolls
>off then remake them in 32 or 64K.
>
>Any other thoughts?
> Robert
>
>
>
>:wq!
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: E344DA3B
> @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
>DISCLAIMER:
> These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
>
>Diagnosis: witzelsucht
>
>IPv6 = robert@ipv6.rdlg.net http://ipv6.rdlg.net
>IPv4 = robert@mail.rdlg.net http://www.rdlg.net
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-28 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-28 14:35 Slowing down disk access? Robert L. Harris
2003-02-28 18:03 ` kwijibo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E5FA488.2080208@zianet.com \
--to=kwijibo@zianet.com \
--cc=Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox