From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 12:55:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 12:55:18 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:260 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 12:55:16 -0500 Message-ID: <3E60F663.7070906@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 13:05:23 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Hinds CC: Pavel Roskin , David Hinds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fallback to PCI IRQs for TI bridges References: <20030301093814.A6700@sonic.net> In-Reply-To: <20030301093814.A6700@sonic.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Hinds wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:30:36PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > >>David, I understand from the Linux MAINTAINERS file that you also maintain >>the PCMCIA code in the kernel. It's quite strange for me, because the >>kernel code is quite different from what I used to see in pcmcia-cs. > > > Well, I'd have to say that I feel a little squeemish about being > called the maintainer of the kernel code because I don't feel I can > devote the time to it that it needs. If someone else is willing to > step up I'd happily cede the job to them. I can certainly understand that. However, I do see occasionally code updates and help from you, so I just wanted to say -- thanks, a bunch, for the help you provide. Even if you're not officially dubbed "maintainer", your knowledge is invaluable. Thanks! Jeff