From: ChristopherHuhn <c.huhn@gsi.de>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-smp <linux-smp@vger.kernel.org>,
support-gsi@credativ.de
Subject: Re: Kernel Bug at spinlock.h ?!
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 17:03:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E637CDC.3030409@GSI.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1030303103332.22802A-100000@chaos>
Hi,
I'm sorry I didn't know about ksymoops as I'm not experienced with
kernel bugs yet.
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>The "Re: Kernel Bug at spinlock.h ?!" is an eye-catcher because this
>inline code cannot have any bugs or you wouldn't even have booted.
>
I think this is the code, that produced the BUG message:
static inline void spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock)
{
char oldval = 1;
#if SPINLOCK_DEBUG
if (lock->magic != SPINLOCK_MAGIC)
BUG();
...
The oops occured after an uptime of about 50 hours.
I just discovered the following messages in the syslog, right before
that oops (I never found any kernel oops logs in the syslog until now ...):
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address 00000000
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: printing eip:
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: 00000000
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: *pde = 00000000
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: Oops: 0000
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: CPU: 3
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: EIP: 0010:[msr_exit+0/24] Not tainted
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: eax: fffffffe ebx: f1857cb0 ecx:
00000002 edx: 00000008
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: esi: fffffff5 edi: f1857cb0 ebp:
f1857c90 esp: f1857c84
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: Process sh (pid: 29359, stackpage=f1857000)
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: Stack: f1857cb0 f1857ca8 00000000
f1857d38 c02a8ff1 f1857cb0 f1857d58 f1856000
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: 00000001 fffffefd ffffffff
00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
Feb 27 20:51:37 lxb039 kernel: 00000000 00000000 fffffffe
00000000 00000003 f1857da8 f1857d9c 00000000
Feb 27 20:51:38 lxb039 kernel: Call Trace: [rpc_call_sync+121/164]
[rpc_run_timer+0/240] [nfs3_rpc_wrapper+54/124] [nfs3_proc_lookup
+194/340] [nfs_lookup+122/204]
Feb 27 20:51:38 lxb039 kernel: [dput+27/464]
[link_path_walk+2940/3200] [in_group_p+32/40] [vfs_permission+121/248]
[d_alloc+25/476]
[real_lookup+169/360]
Feb 27 20:51:38 lxb039 kernel: [link_path_walk+2425/3200]
[path_walk+29/36] [path_lookup+30/44] [__user_walk+45/72] [sys_stat64+26/11
2] [sys_close+115/140]
Feb 27 20:51:38 lxb039 kernel: [system_call+51/56]
Feb 27 20:51:38 lxb039 kernel:
Feb 27 20:51:38 lxb039 kernel: Code: Bad EIP value.
Looks like a NFS problem, huh?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-03 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-03 8:11 Kernel Bug at spinlock.h ?! ChristopherHuhn
2003-03-03 8:51 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-03-03 10:12 ` ChristopherHuhn
2003-03-03 15:13 ` ChristopherHuhn
2003-03-03 15:30 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-03-03 15:41 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-03-03 16:03 ` ChristopherHuhn [this message]
2003-03-03 16:42 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-03-03 17:49 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-03-04 13:58 ` ChristopherHuhn
2003-03-05 5:49 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-03-06 13:16 ` ChristopherHuhn
2003-03-07 15:47 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-03-10 8:52 ` ChristopherHuhn
2003-03-03 16:39 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E637CDC.3030409@GSI.de \
--to=c.huhn@gsi.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-smp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=support-gsi@credativ.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox