Re: [arch-users] Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone

David Lang
2003-03-16T03:19:36Z

hey guys, the suggestion to move to another list for this discussion was
to reduce traffic on the kernel list, not add a bunch of arch discussions
to the bitkeeper discussions.

pick one list and use it, don't use both.

David Lang

On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Adam Spiers wrote:

> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 02:06:17 +0000
> From: Adam Spiers <arch-users@adamspiers.org>
> To: arch-users@lists.fifthvision.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [arch-users] Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone
>
> Tom Lord (lord@emf.net) wrote:
> > `+'-named log message files _are_ going to change to something more
> > vi-friendly. My bad. I'm both an emacs user and a
> > unix-traditionalist. I didn't initially notice the problem and my
> > reaction on hearing about it was "Well, vi is broken" -- but as a
> > practical matter, arch does need to change in that area.
>
> Not that you need any more prodding on this direction, but it's worth
> noting that both more(1) and less(1) suffer from this problem too.
>
> $ touch +foo
> $ more +foo
> usage: more [-dflpcsu] [+linenum | +/pattern] name1 name2 ...
> $ less +foo
> Missing filename ("less --help" for help)
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>