From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>,
Christoffer Hall-Frederiksen <hall@jiffies.dk>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux aacraid devel <linux-aacraid-devel@dell.com>,
dledford@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Problem with aacraid driver in 2.5.63-bk-latest
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:31:13 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E6FDF61.8060708@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1047517604.23902.39.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 23:55, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>
>> /*
>> * Limit max queue depth on a single lun to 256 for now. Remember,
>> * we allocate a struct scsi_command for each of these and keep it
>> * around forever. Too deep of a depth just wastes memory.
>> */
>> if(tags > 256)
>> return;
>>....
>
>
> I can see the memory consideration. However the thing can really handle big
> queues well. Possibly we should be setting the queue to 512 / somefunction(volumes)
> though to avoid the worst case overcommit here
The situation is different between 2.4 and 2.5 ...
In 2.4 the per device queue_depth is an unsigned char
and that number of scsi_cmnd instances are pre-allocated
in the scsi_build_commandblocks() function. So the worst
case number of scsi_cmnd instances for all scsi devices
is always available (at the expense of [wasted] ram).
In 2.5 queue_depth is an unsigned short and a slab
allocator called "scsi_cmd_cache" is used as required.
There is some throttle logic (or at least it has been
talked about) to make sure one scsi_cmnd instance per
scsi device will always be available.
I think that comment (probably by Doug Ledford) refers
to the 2.5 series before the slab allocator was
introduced.
Doug Gilbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-13 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030228133037.GB7473@jiffies.dk>
2003-03-12 23:06 ` Problem with aacraid driver in 2.5.63-bk-latest Mark Haverkamp
2003-03-13 0:18 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-12 23:55 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-03-13 1:06 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-13 0:50 ` Mike Anderson
2003-03-13 23:13 ` Mark Haverkamp
2003-03-14 7:05 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-03-14 10:18 ` Mike Anderson
2003-03-13 1:31 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2003-03-13 23:27 ` Doug Ledford
2003-03-13 15:42 ` Mark Haverkamp
2003-03-13 23:17 ` Doug Ledford
2003-03-13 23:22 ` Mark Haverkamp
2003-03-13 23:25 ` Doug Ledford
2003-03-14 14:57 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-14 15:34 ` Mark Haverkamp
2003-03-14 16:48 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-03 10:05 Christoffer Hall-Frederiksen
2003-03-03 13:40 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-03 14:46 ` Christoffer Hall-Frederiksen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E6FDF61.8060708@torque.net \
--to=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=hall@jiffies.dk \
--cc=linux-aacraid-devel@dell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markh@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox