From: jjs <jjs@tmsusa.com>
To: elenstev@mesatop.com
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm2
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 14:17:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E78EC63.9050308@tmsusa.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1048111359.1807.13.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov
Steven P. Cole wrote:
>I repeated the tests with 2.5.65-mm2 elevator=deadline and the situation
>was similar to elevator=as. Running dbench on ext3, the response to
>desktop switches and window wiggles was improved over running dbench on
>reiserfs, but typing in Evolution was subject to long delays with dbench
>clients greater than 16.
>
>I rebooted with 2.5.65-bk and ran dbench on ext3 again. Everything was
>going smoothly, excellent interactivity, and then with dbench 28, the
>system froze. No response to pings, no response to alt-sysrq-b (after
>alt-sysrq-s). A hard reset was required. Nothing interesting logged.
>Too bad. Before it crashed, 2.5.65-bk was responding to typing in an
>Evolution new message window better than -mm2.
>
Just out of curiosity, what is the result of:
cat /proc/sys/sched/max_timeslice?
Does setting that to e.g. 50 make -mm2 smooth?
Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-19 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-19 9:21 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 10:07 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 10:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 10:26 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Danny ter Haar
2003-03-19 19:51 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-19 20:10 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 20:57 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 22:02 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 22:17 ` jjs [this message]
2003-03-19 22:51 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 23:04 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Robert Love
2003-03-19 23:19 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 4:50 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-19 23:09 ` 2.5.65-mm2 jjs
2003-03-20 0:33 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 23:45 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 4:27 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ed Tomlinson
2003-03-20 5:04 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-20 14:36 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-20 19:48 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 20:12 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 21:07 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 21:15 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-21 5:20 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-21 6:06 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-21 6:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303210710490.2533-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-22 19:50 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-19 23:17 2.5.65-mm2 Charles Baylis
2003-03-20 1:38 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-20 4:56 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E78EC63.9050308@tmsusa.com \
--to=jjs@tmsusa.com \
--cc=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox