Re: 2.5.65-mm2

Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20T21:07:50Z

On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 14:07, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> At 01:12 PM 3/20/2003 -0700, Steven P. Cole wrote:
> >On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 12:48, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > At 07:36 AM 3/20/2003 -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
> > > Bottom line is that once cpu hogs are falsely determined to be sleepers,
> > > positive feedback kills you.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > >
> >Sure, either post a patch against a known sync point, .65, .65-bk, or
> >65-mm2, or send me the sched.c file itself (2600 lines might be a little
> >too much for the entire list).
> >
> >If you send it in the next 2 hours, I can test today, otherwise I'll do
> >it mañana.
>
> What the heck. It is attached.
>
> -Mike
>
> (and I repeat, don't _look_, just run it, and let me know;)

[steven@spc1 linux-2.5.65-mg]$ patch -p1 <../../xx.diff
patching file include/linux/sched.h
patching file kernel/fork.c
patching file kernel/printk.c
patching file kernel/sched.c
patch: **** unexpected end of file in patch

It looks like the last hunk has no trailing context lines.
Did your patch get clobbered?

Steven