Re: 2.5.65-mm2

Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20T04:41:01Z

At 11:17 PM 3/19/2003 +0000, Charles Baylis wrote:

>I'm getting quite a lot of audio skips with this one. 2.5.64-mm8 was the
>last one I tested and it was very good.
>
>2.5.64-mm8 works fine with pretty much any thud load I throw at it, but thud
>3 is enough to cause some skips with 2.5.65-mm2. Thud 5 causes serious
>starvation problems to the whole desktop.

My crude hack helped with thud and some others, but is b0rken for others.

-Mike