From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:20:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:20:28 -0500 Received: from relay04.valueweb.net ([216.219.253.238]:39911 "EHLO relay04.valueweb.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:20:16 -0500 Message-ID: <3E7F40D0.6010202@coyotegulch.com> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:30:56 -0500 From: Scott Robert Ladd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030319 Debian/1.3-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan-Benedict Glaw CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Testing: What do you want? References: <3E7F1A2D.4050306@coyotegulch.com> <20030324153933.GH30613@lug-owl.de> In-Reply-To: <20030324153933.GH30613@lug-owl.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > sparc32? If you get it to build or even to boot, please drop me a note > > Last time I looked at it, sparc32 wasn't in any good state (esp. SMP) in > 2.5.x. This is because Dave S. Miller stopped spending a lot of hacking > time (he has to work for other things now and only merges patches he > gets sent, where he formerly did tons on active development for > sparc32). I'll let you know about whether it works or not. What you tell me about SPARC support, however, does not bode well. I was about to say "I'm surprised that Sun isn't providing any support" -- then my senses returned, and I realized I'm not surprised in the least. ..Scott -- Scott Robert Ladd Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com)