From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:38:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:38:58 -0500 Received: from imr1.ericy.com ([208.237.135.240]:54007 "EHLO imr1.ericy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:38:57 -0500 From: "Philippe Meloche (LMC)" To: davidel@xmailserver.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3E89B55F.1010207@lmc.ericsson.se> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 10:50:55 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Process limits for epoll tests Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, We tried to reproduce the tests you've done with /dev/epoll and we've come to ask us some questions. 1. How did you managed httperf to perform more than 1024 connections when it's using select() ? 2. Did you get some errors like client-timeout or connections reset when you were doing your tests ? 3. How much time did a burst test ( 27000 connections and 2 calls per connection ) last and how many sample did httperf took during those tests. Thanks a lot Philippe Meloche philippe.meloche@lmc.ericsson.se