From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263595AbTDGSSG (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:18:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263596AbTDGSSG (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:18:06 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:60299 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263595AbTDGSSE (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:18:04 -0400 Message-ID: <3E91C398.9070400@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 14:29:44 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell CC: zwane@linuxpower.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: SET_MODULE_OWNER? References: <20030407064755.DEAD62C06C@lists.samba.org> In-Reply-To: <20030407064755.DEAD62C06C@lists.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rusty Russell wrote: > I thought it was completely useless, hence deprecated. > > Anyone have any reason to defend it? It's used to allow source compatibility with all kernels, old or new. Thus it is in active use, and should not be removed. Jeff