From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: fsync() on unix domain sockets?
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 15:31:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E934DB7.1000503@kegel.com> (raw)
Let's say someone had written a win32 emulator that
ran in userspace, and was using unix domain sockets
to emulate win32 named pipes. (Yes, this is how
Wine does it at the moment, but it's a poor fit,
and they're thinking of switching to emulating them 100%
in userspace so they can get the semantics right.)
It turns out that in this situation, it would be handy
for fsync() to work on unix domain sockets. This would
require a bit of plumbing to let sockets expose an fsync() method,
together with an fsync() method for unix domain sockets.
After thinking about this a bit, I couldn't resist
writing that method for stream sockets. Being a kernel newbie,
I am unsure if I got the locking and reference counting right.
Anyone care to peek at it and see if there are glaring problems?
(If not, I guess I could go do the needed plumbing and see how it works in practice.)
Thanks,
Dan
/* to be added to net/unix/af_unix.c */
static long unix_stream_fsync(unix_socket * sk)
{
int err;
long timeo;
unix_socket *other;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
timeo = sock_sndtimeo(sk, 0);
err = -ENOTCONN;
other = unix_peer_get(sk);
if (!other)
goto out;
unix_state_rlock(sk);
add_wait_queue(sk->sleep, &wait);
unix_state_runlock(sk);
for (;;) {
int breakme;
unix_state_rlock(other);
breakme = !skb_queue_len(&other->receive_queue) ||
other->err ||
(other->shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
!timeo;
unix_state_runlock(other);
if (breakme)
break;
if (signal_pending(current))
goto out_sig;
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo);
}
err = 0;
out_run:
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
unix_state_rlock(sk);
remove_wait_queue(sk->sleep, &wait);
unix_state_runlock(sk);
sock_put(other);
out:
return err;
out_sig:
err = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
goto out_run;
}
--
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-08 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-08 22:31 Dan Kegel [this message]
2003-04-09 1:10 ` fsync() on unix domain sockets? Richard B. Johnson
2003-04-09 1:27 ` Dan Kegel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E934DB7.1000503@kegel.com \
--to=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox