From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264381AbTDKOxs (for ); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:53:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264382AbTDKOxs (for ); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:53:48 -0400 Received: from 12-229-131-42.client.attbi.com ([12.229.131.42]:11146 "EHLO waltsathlon.localhost.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264381AbTDKOxr (for ); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:53:47 -0400 Message-ID: <3E96D9B5.5060704@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 08:05:25 -0700 From: Walt H User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030409 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: 2.4.20-ck5 References: <3E96D711.70404@comcast.net> <200304120101.32423.kernel@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: <200304120101.32423.kernel@kolivas.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.74.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Con Kolivas wrote: > > XFS must be responsible. I can't test it fully myself but it appears to be > related to the latest xfs update I've included in -ck5 which is a snapshot > from the sgi website only a week old. Until further notice, use ck4 if you > wish to use XFS. > > Thanks for the feedback. > > Con > Thanks Con. Now that I think about it, I probably should've cc'd the xfs list. There was some work done on memory leaks in XFS recently - something in here must expose additional leaks. Thanks again, -Walt