From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Aniruddha M Marathe <aniruddha.marathe@wipro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] settimeofday(2) succeeds for microsecond value more than USEC_PER_SEC and for negative value
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:25:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E986814.4060606@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94F20261551DC141B6B559DC491086723E10C2@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com>
Aniruddha M Marathe wrote:
> |Aniruddha M Marathe wrote:
> |> Even then, I think, we can modify the settimeofday code to
> |check -1 and USEC_PER_SEC
> |> Conditions, can't we?
> |>
>
> George wrote:
>
> |Uh, sure. This is the test I prefer:
> |
> | if( (unsigned long)tv->usec > USEC_PER_SEC)
> | return EINVAL;
> |
> |
> |This change should go in do_sys_settimeofday() in kernel/time.c. It
> |will fix both settimeofday and clock_settime(CLOCK_REALTIME,... And
> |also fixes it in all archs.
> |
> |-g
>
> How about
> If( (unsigned long)tv->usec >= USEC_PER_SEC)
> return EINVAL;
Right, my mistake ;)
-g
>
> Even if tv_usec value is 10^6, it should give EINVAL.
> Man page must also be updated
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-12 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-12 10:43 [BUG] settimeofday(2) succeeds for microsecond value more than USEC_PER_SEC and for negative value Aniruddha M Marathe
2003-04-12 19:25 ` george anzinger [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-11 13:07 Aniruddha M Marathe
2003-04-11 21:36 ` george anzinger
2003-05-02 18:06 ` Urs Thuermann
2003-04-11 5:12 Aniruddha M Marathe
2003-04-11 6:26 ` george anzinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E986814.4060606@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=aniruddha.marathe@wipro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox