From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264054AbTDOTyt (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:54:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264056AbTDOTyt (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:54:49 -0400 Received: from zeke.inet.com ([199.171.211.198]:35288 "EHLO zeke.inet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264054AbTDOTys (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:54:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3E9C664A.503@inet.com> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:06:34 -0500 From: Eli Carter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: LKML Subject: .section ... "ax" vs #alloc, #execinstr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Some of the assembly files use .section ".start", "ax" and others use .section ".start", #alloc, #execinstr (and not just for .start, try find -name \*.S | xargs grep -e '\.section' ) These appear to be equivelent, if not somebody clue me in please. :) Which is the prefered form? The latter seems to provide a bit more for the human, so I'd vote that direction... ;) Thanks, Eli --------------------. "If it ain't broke now, Eli Carter \ it will be soon." -- crypto-gram eli.carter(a)inet.com `-------------------------------------------------