From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264292AbTDPLLc (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:11:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264300AbTDPLLb (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:11:31 -0400 Received: from [212.202.223.187] ([212.202.223.187]:29568 "EHLO gw.localnet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264292AbTDPLLb (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:11:31 -0400 Message-ID: <3E9D3D34.3030601@trash.net> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:23:32 +0200 From: Patrick McHardy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030327 Debian/1.3-4 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King CC: Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: Fwd: [Bug 592] New: BUG at kernel/softirq.c:105 References: <20030416120330.B7188@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20030416120330.B7188@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote something about this BUG, his mail is here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=104979788626334&w=2 Bye, Patrick Russell King wrote: >I've been trying to trace this callpath, and have hit a dead end in >release_dev(). It seems to go weird after there, which makes it >difficult to audit the code path. > >Anyone got any ideas? > >I'm not too bothered about this bug since I don't look after the ppp >or tty (line discipline) code, so I'm also looking for someone else >to assign this to. > >