public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: Toon van der Pas <toon@hout.vanvergehaald.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.67-mm4
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:25:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EA08962.2010506@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030418154911.GA16046@hout.vanvergehaald.nl>

Toon van der Pas wrote:

>On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 01:45:36AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.5/2.5.67/2.5.67-mm4/
>>
>>. A bunch of anticipatory scheduler patches.
>>
>>  For the first time ever, AS is working well with both IDE and SCSI
>>  under all the usual tests.
>>
>>  It works just fine on SCSI with zero TCQ tags, and with four TCQ tags. 
>>  At eight tags, read-vs-write performace is starting to measurably drop off.
>>  At 32 tags it is about 2000x slower than at zero or four tags.
>>
>>  My recommendation, as always, is to disable SCSI TCQ completely.  If you
>>  really must, set it to four tags.
>>
>
>What about drivers that bypass de SCSI layer?
>I administer a server with a Mylex RAID controller (DAC960)...
>
I'd say they will show the same behaviour. As far as we can tell
its an interaction between badly behaving TCQ disks (those which
allow lots of writes to bypass a read), and the anticipatory
scheduler. We will be working on fixing this so those inclined
can use huge numbers of outstanding tags without things going
too haywire.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-04-18 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-18  8:45 2.5.67-mm4 Andrew Morton
2003-04-18  9:17 ` 2.5.67-mm4 Andrei Ivanov
2003-04-18  9:26   ` 2.5.67-mm4 Andrew Morton
2003-04-18 14:31     ` 2.5.67-mm4 Seth Chandler
2003-04-18 15:32     ` 2.5.67-mm4 Andrei Ivanov
2003-04-18 15:49 ` 2.5.67-mm4 Toon van der Pas
2003-04-18 21:48   ` 2.5.67-mm4 Andrew Morton
2003-04-18 23:25   ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2003-04-18 16:17 ` 2.5.67-mm4 devfs don't compile Helge Hafting
2003-04-18 16:24   ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-04-19 18:28 ` 2.5.67-mm4 Arador
2003-04-19 21:02   ` 2.5.67-mm4 Andrew Morton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-18 19:37 2.5.67-mm4 Andrei Ivanov
2003-04-18 20:54 ` 2.5.67-mm4 Nick Orlov
2003-04-18 21:54   ` 2.5.67-mm4 Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-18 22:10     ` 2.5.67-mm4 Nick Orlov
2003-04-18 22:12       ` 2.5.67-mm4 Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-18 22:29         ` 2.5.67-mm4 Nick Orlov
2003-04-18 23:07           ` 2.5.67-mm4 Nick Orlov
2003-04-19  7:45             ` 2.5.67-mm4 Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EA08962.2010506@cyberone.com.au \
    --to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toon@hout.vanvergehaald.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox