From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263671AbTDTSbm (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:31:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263672AbTDTSbm (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:31:42 -0400 Received: from fed1mtao01.cox.net ([68.6.19.244]:4823 "EHLO fed1mtao01.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263671AbTDTSbl (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:31:41 -0400 Message-ID: <3EA2E8CC.4080201@cox.net> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 11:37:00 -0700 From: "Kevin P. Fleming" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: irq balancing; kernel vs. userspace References: <6uwuhpl2u5.fsf@zork.zork.net> <1050863476.1412.11.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> In-Reply-To: <1050863476.1412.11.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sun, 2003-04-20 at 15:23, Sean Neakums wrote: > >>I thought I'd play with the userspace IRQ-balancer, but booting with >>noirqbalance seems not to not balance. Possibly I misunderstand how >>this all fits together. > > > this looks like you haven't started the userspace daemon (yet) I thought the same thing reading his original message, then I looked closer. He booted using "noirqbalance", did not start the userspace balancer, and yet his IRQs are still being balanced.