From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263779AbTDUGqS (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 02:46:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263780AbTDUGqS (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 02:46:18 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:17840 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263779AbTDUGqR (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 02:46:17 -0400 Message-ID: <3EA3967F.2010904@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 02:58:07 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Brown CC: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK->CVS, kernel.bkbits.net References: <20030417162723.GA29380@work.bitmover.com> <20030420003021.GA10547@work.bitmover.com> <16035.30645.648954.185797@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <16035.30645.648954.185797@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Neil Brown wrote: > That is an order of magnitude difference in wall-clock time! This is > on my humble notebook with "only" 128Meg of RAM. The delay is mostly > in the consistency checking. Sure there is a way to turn that off. Yeah, my laptop w/ 128M is the same. I think you need at least 256M for vaguely usable caching, and preferably 512M or more :) Jeff