From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261165AbTDUNNo (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:13:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261177AbTDUNNo (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:13:44 -0400 Received: from dbl.q-ag.de ([80.146.160.66]:59309 "EHLO dbl.q-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261165AbTDUNNn (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:13:43 -0400 Message-ID: <3EA3F153.3000106@colorfullife.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 15:25:39 +0200 From: Manfred Spraul User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030313 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Q: nr_threads locking Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew, According to the comments, nr_threads is protected by lock_kernel, but do_fork() runs without the bkl for ages. Would it be possible to use your percpu_counters for nr_threads? It seems to be used only to guard against fork bombs and for i_nlink of /proc. -- Manfred