From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S264018AbTDWPn7 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:43:59 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264086AbTDWPn7
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:43:59 -0400
Received: from dsl-fl-207-34-65-6-cgy.nucleus.com ([207.34.65.6]:23772 "EHLO
	bluetooth.WNI.AD") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264018AbTDWPn6
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:43:58 -0400
Message-ID: <3EA6B8FA.2020409@WirelessNetworksInc.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:02:02 -0600
From: Herman Oosthuysen <Herman@WirelessNetworksInc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How did the Spelling Police miss this one?
References: <200304230936_MC3-1-35AA-864B@compuserve.com> <1051109635.29423.20.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov>
In-Reply-To: <1051109635.29423.20.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Apr 2003 15:56:05.0251 (UTC) FILETIME=[D8C9E530:01C309B0]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Uhh, should that not be "canonize"?
(To conform to the canon)
You can save four more characters I would think... ;-)

Steven Cole wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 07:33, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> 
>>[me@qq linux-2.5.68-ref]$ grep -R cannonicalize * | wc -l
>>     65
>>
>>
>>
>>  Avast there ye swabs, prepare to fire a broadside!
> 
> 
> Almost all of the spelling fixes from the Spelling Police were in
> comments, not code.  This mistaken spelling of canonicalize is mostly in
> various parts of the non-comment code.