From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263913AbTDYXEm (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 19:04:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264542AbTDYXEm (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 19:04:42 -0400 Received: from pheriche.sun.com ([192.18.98.34]:24283 "EHLO pheriche.sun.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263913AbTDYXEe (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 19:04:34 -0400 Message-ID: <3EA9C104.9080300@sun.com> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:13:08 -0700 From: Hui Huang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE & stack location References: <20030425220018$6219@gated-at.bofh.it> <20030425220018$76b1@gated-at.bofh.it> <20030425225007$3fae@gated-at.bofh.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > >>I've moved PAGE_OFFSET around a lot (which moves the stack, as you say). >>Haven't seen it break anything yet ... IMHO it was broken anyway if this >>hurts it. Obviously not something one could do in a stable kernel series, >>but 2.5 seems like a perfect time for it to me ... unless I'm missing some >>glibc / linker thing, it seems like a simple change. > > > It at least broke Sun Java. > That has been fixed in latest JDK.