public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
	Bill Hartner <bhartner@us.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] Re: Bug 619 - sched_best_cpu does not pick best cpu (2/2)
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 18:28:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EB70FC2.1010903@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3EB70EEC.9040004@us.ibm.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 756 bytes --]

This patch is in regard to bugme.osdl.org bug 619, link here:

http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619

This is the second of two patches to fix this bug.  This patch fills in 
include/linux/topology.h (created in the last patch) with a couple 
#defines.  The patch also creates a generic_hweight64() in 
include/linux/bitops.h, which we've been lacking for a while.  It then 
uses these new macros in sched.c to ensure that if a node has no CPUs, 
it is not used in scheduling decisions.

[mcd@arrakis src]$ diffstat ~/patches/node_online.patch
  include/linux/bitops.h   |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/topology.h |    7 +++++++
  kernel/sched.c           |    2 +-
  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Cheers!

-Matt

[-- Attachment #2: node_online.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2486 bytes --]

diff -Nur --exclude-from=/home/mcd/.dontdiff linux-2.5.69-add_linux_topo/include/linux/bitops.h linux-2.5.69-node_online_fix/include/linux/bitops.h
--- linux-2.5.69-add_linux_topo/include/linux/bitops.h	Sun May  4 16:53:42 2003
+++ linux-2.5.69-node_online_fix/include/linux/bitops.h	Mon May  5 18:00:00 2003
@@ -107,6 +107,33 @@
         return (res & 0x0F) + ((res >> 4) & 0x0F);
 }
 
+#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 64)
+
+static inline unsigned int generic_hweight64(unsigned int w)
+{
+        unsigned int res = (w & 0x5555555555555555) + ((w >> 1) & 0x5555555555555555);
+        res = (res & 0x3333333333333333) + ((res >> 2) & 0x3333333333333333);
+        res = (res & 0x0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F) + ((res >> 4) & 0x0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F);
+        res = (res & 0x00FF00FF00FF00FF) + ((res >> 8) & 0x00FF00FF00FF00FF);
+        res = (res & 0x0000FFFF0000FFFF) + ((res >> 16) & 0x0000FFFF0000FFFF);
+        return (res & 0x00000000FFFFFFFF) + ((res >> 32) & 0x00000000FFFFFFFF);
+}
+
+#define hweight_long(w)	generic_hweight64(w)
+
+#endif /* BITS_PER_LONG == 64 */
+
+#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 32)
+
+static inline unsigned int generic_hweight64(unsigned int *w)
+{
+	return generic_hweight32(w[0]) + generic_hweight32(w[1]);
+}
+
+#define hweight_long(w)	generic_hweight32(w)
+
+#endif /* BITS_PER_LONG == 32 */
+
 #include <asm/bitops.h>
 
 
diff -Nur --exclude-from=/home/mcd/.dontdiff linux-2.5.69-add_linux_topo/include/linux/topology.h linux-2.5.69-node_online_fix/include/linux/topology.h
--- linux-2.5.69-add_linux_topo/include/linux/topology.h	Mon May  5 17:43:35 2003
+++ linux-2.5.69-node_online_fix/include/linux/topology.h	Mon May  5 18:10:29 2003
@@ -27,6 +27,13 @@
 #ifndef _LINUX_TOPOLOGY_H
 #define _LINUX_TOPOLOGY_H
 
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <asm/topology.h>
 
+#define nr_cpus_node(node)	(hweight_long(node_to_cpumask(node)))
+
+#define for_each_node_with_cpus(node) \
+	for (node = 0; node < numnodes; node++) \
+		if (nr_cpus_node(node)
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_TOPOLOGY_H */
diff -Nur --exclude-from=/home/mcd/.dontdiff linux-2.5.69-add_linux_topo/kernel/sched.c linux-2.5.69-node_online_fix/kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.5.69-add_linux_topo/kernel/sched.c	Sun May  4 16:53:37 2003
+++ linux-2.5.69-node_online_fix/kernel/sched.c	Mon May  5 18:10:58 2003
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@
 		return best_cpu;
 
 	minload = 10000000;
-	for (i = 0; i < numnodes; i++) {
+	for_each_node_with_cpus(i) {
 		load = atomic_read(&node_nr_running[i]);
 		if (load < minload) {
 			minload = load;

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-06  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-06  1:25 [patch] Re: Bug 619 - sched_best_cpu does not pick best cpu (1/2) Matthew Dobson
2003-05-06  1:28 ` Matthew Dobson [this message]
2003-05-06  2:09   ` [patch] Re: Bug 619 - sched_best_cpu does not pick best cpu (2/2) David S. Miller
2003-05-06 11:06   ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-05-15  1:29 ` [patch] Re: Bug 619 - sched_best_cpu does not pick best cpu (1/1) Andrew Theurer
2003-05-15  1:26   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-15  1:48     ` Andrew Theurer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EB70FC2.1010903@us.ibm.com \
    --to=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=bhartner@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=habanero@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox