public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
	akpm@zip.com.au, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	mec@shout.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic magic
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 08:08:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EB92176.8010803@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030507143059.GA1057@mars.ravnborg.org>

Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 02:35:42AM -0700, george anzinger wrote:
> 
>>If the arch wanted to supply only some of the content, the configure 
>>option as is used with some today, is still available.  CURRENT USAGE 
>>IS NOT AFFECTED.
> 
> 
> The usage of magic symlinks shall be kept minimal. 
> The asm -> $(ARCH)-asm symlink already has caused me troubles when
> doing cross compilation. Also the separate obj tree patch treats
> the symlink with special care.
> 
> the gain should be high introducing one more symlink.
> For what I understood the gain is only to avoid a couple of
> one line files that include another file. Not enough to justify a 
> second symlink IMHO.

That is a good point.  To the other side, the symlink is arch 
independent and is just "asm->."  Also, if you are introducing a file 
with asm code, you either cause all "other" archs to fail (till they 
catch up) or you must introduce the simple one line file in each arch.

-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml


  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-07 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-06  6:41 [PATCH] asm-generic magic george anzinger
2003-05-06  7:26 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-06 20:15   ` george anzinger
2003-05-07  2:55     ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07  9:35       ` george anzinger
2003-05-07 14:30         ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-05-07 15:08           ` george anzinger [this message]
2003-05-07 14:06             ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07 15:33               ` george anzinger
2003-05-07 14:31                 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-07 15:24           ` Kbuild newbie/promotional docs needed John van V.
2003-05-07 20:24             ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EB92176.8010803@mvista.com \
    --to=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mec@shout.net \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox