From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hammer: MAP_32BIT
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 10:39:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EBBE7E2.1070500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030509092026.GA11012@averell>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andi Kleen wrote:
> That's just an inadequate data structure. It does an linear search of the
> VMAs and you probably have a lot of them. Before you add kludges like this
> better fix the data structure for fast free space lookup.
If you mean the code in arch_get_unmapped_area(), yes, this needs
fixing. In fact, Ingo has already a patch which brings back the
performance of thread creation to what we had back in September/October.
> In some vendor kernels it's already in /proc/pid/mapped_base, but that is
> quite costly to change. That would probably give you the best of both, Just
> set it to a low value for the thread stacks and then reset it to the default.
>
> I guess that would be the better solution for your stacks.
Are you sure this is the best solution? It means the mmap regions for
restricted 31/32 bit addresses and that for the normal, unrestricted
mapping is continuous. This removes a lot of freedom in deciding where
the unrestricted mappings are best located and it would make programs
using threads have a very different memory layout. Not that it should
make any difference; but I can here /them/ already scream that this
breaks applications.
My kernel-uninformed opinion would be to keep the settings separate.
Oh, and please rename MAP_32BIT to MAP_31BIT. This will save nerves on
all sides.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+u+fi2ijCOnn/RHQRAqeBAKC3ZlSCNcw3f7SXahvxRc0WMupYgwCgyBGy
fMqzCxWcx90e002CNUQqwgM=
=LDJf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-09 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-09 7:35 hammer: MAP_32BIT Ulrich Drepper
2003-05-09 9:20 ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-09 11:28 ` mikpe
2003-05-09 11:38 ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-09 11:52 ` mikpe
2003-05-09 12:16 ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-09 18:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-09 19:24 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-05-09 20:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-09 21:45 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-05-09 22:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-09 22:20 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-05-09 22:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-09 22:20 ` Timothy Miller
2003-05-09 22:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-09 22:46 ` Timothy Miller
2003-05-09 23:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-13 14:25 ` Timothy Miller
2003-05-09 22:22 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-05-09 22:53 ` Timothy Miller
2003-05-09 23:24 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-05-10 0:00 ` Edgar Toernig
2003-05-10 0:58 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-05-10 2:51 ` Edgar Toernig
2003-05-09 17:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-09 17:39 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2003-05-10 1:48 ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-10 20:10 ` David Woodhouse
2003-05-13 18:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EBBE7E2.1070500@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox