Re: Sorry if this question is the beaten dead horse

[Arthur Perry <art@perryconsulting.net>]

Aww geesh.

I am such a fool.
All I have to say is 'less ./Documentation/Changes'.
I will give this a go first before I send another silly email.
remember to RTFM.  ;)

Sorry about that.

Been a while since I had to read the kernel user's readmes.




Arthur Perry wrote:
> Hello All,
> 
> I have a question, sorry if it is totally out of this league.
> I have been trying to compile a 2.5 kernel with modules support for a 
> while, and have always been unsuccessful.
> There are always unresolved symbols.
> Always. Tons of em. If I didn't know any better, I'd say all of them of 
> which I tried to compile as modules.
> I am not a newbie to Linux, I have been putting together distros for 
> over 6 years, but the past year or two I have been maintaining stable 
> releases in production environments.
> Just recently, I have tried to build the 2.5 tree, adn I know I am 
> missing something.
> 
> I am using Slackware 9.0, which is glibc 2.3.1 and gcc 3.2.2.
> Modutils 2.4.25 with Rusty's module-init-tools-0.9.12.
> It is mostly Vanilla otherwise.
> 
> I know I must be missing a lot of tools and system-side changes to 
> accomodate a 2.5 kernel, and I have been trying to identify what they are.
> 
> No need to get too specific, I have been categorically a kernel "user" 
> for quite some time (just not a 2.5 one), so I just need quick info and 
> links.
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance!!
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>