Re: lk maintainers

Paul Mundt
2003-08-05T13:53:06Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 553 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:36:03PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> This document is mailed to lkml regularly and will be modified
> whenever new victim wishes to be listed in it or someone can
> no longer devote his time to maintainer work.
>
Isn't this exactly what MAINTAINERS is for? What is the point of
having this lk-maintainers list if MAINTAINERS is supposed to be
authoritative?

It seems like this adds more confusion then anything else, since
now it's not obvious what should be considered the defacto standard
maintainer list.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]