Re: userspace irq balancer

[Kai Bankett <chaosman@ontika.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1049 bytes --]

David S. Miller wrote:

>   From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
>   Date: 19 May 2003 23:36:23 -0700
>   
>   I don't even think we can do that.  That code was being integrated
>   around the same time that our Specweb setup decided to go south on us
>   and start physically frying itself.
>
>This gets more amusing by the second.  Let's kill this code
>already.  People who like the current algorithms can push
>them into the userspace solution.
>
>  
>
That´s also my feeling.
After having more and more performance loss (at least for my 
system/usage) and no real good solution in view to fix the problems at 
this location in the kernel, I would prefer to get this thing ripped of 
as soon as possible.
By now I do not see any gain with that piece of code (relative to 
process/interrupt distribution). And please don´t show me benchmarks - I 
know what I feel.
Userland would be first of all the right place to do any further testing.
And please - don´t tell me it´s that complicated to remove this piece of 
code from source tree.

Kai.


[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3237 bytes --]