public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars <lhofhansl@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: HD DMA disabled in 2.4.21-rc2, works fine in 2.4.20
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 00:06:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ECC770B.4030200@yahoo.com> (raw)

Please read the entire thread.

I am the person who started the thread and yes, I have
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX is not set

Then again, I also do not have a VIA chipset, Jeffrey had
the same problem and he has the VIA chipset, that's where
the confusion comes from.

 From the same post:
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801BA PCI (rev 03)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801BAM ISA Bridge (ICH2) (rev 03)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801BAM IDE U100 (rev 03)

It seems to me that I'm missing something very obvious.

Anyway, as there seems to be no solution at hand for me, so I'm back
to 2.4.20 for the time being until I have time have a look at the
source myself.

-- Lars


-----------------------------------------------------------------


The person who posted their DMESG had it unset.

Here's an archive of the post:

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0305.2/0440.html

And the line:

# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX is not set

From: Lars (lhofhansl@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun May 18 2003 - 22:03:16 EST

--eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey W. Baker [mailto:jwbaker@acm.org]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 5:01 PM
To: Tomas Szepe; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HD DMA disabled in 2.4.21-rc2, works fine in 2.4.20

On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 15:29, Tomas Szepe wrote:
 > > [alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk]
 > >
 > > On Llu, 2003-05-19 at 21:04, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
 > > > I was using Via IDE chipset and, yes, I had configured the kernel for
 > > > VIA support. That's why it worked in 2.4.20. But it stopped working
in
 > > > 2.4.21-rc.
 > >
 > > VIA IDE should be working reliably, my main test box is an EPIA series
 > > VIA system so the VIA IDE does get a fair beating
 >
 > This person is running with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX unset.

No, this person is not.

-jwb



             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-22  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-22  7:06 Lars [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-24  2:45 HD DMA disabled in 2.4.21-rc2, works fine in 2.4.20 Lars
2003-05-19 23:12 Mudama, Eric
2003-05-19 19:56 Mudama, Eric
2003-05-19 20:04 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2003-05-19 19:45   ` Alan Cox
2003-05-19 22:29     ` Tomas Szepe
2003-05-19 23:00       ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2003-05-20  1:25 ` lars hofhansl
2003-05-17  3:56 Jeffrey Baker
2003-05-18  7:59 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-05-19  3:03   ` Lars
2003-05-15  7:56 Lars

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3ECC770B.4030200@yahoo.com \
    --to=lhofhansl@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox