* drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c
@ 2003-05-26 22:57 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger @ 2003-05-26 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andre Hedrick
Cc: Alan Cox, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Hello IDE gurus,
is the following #if 0 in drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c intentional?
What makes me worried about the code is that it looks like somebody
wanted to clean up the code for splitoff of pdc202xx_new.c and confused
the two files.
Either the code is really not needed and can be ripped out or it is
needed and was overlooked.
drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c:719
/*
* software reset - this is required because the bios
* will set UDMA timing on if the hdd supports it. The
* user may want to turn udma off. A bug in the pdc20262
* is that it cannot handle a downgrade in timing from
* UDMA to DMA. Disk accesses after issuing a set
* feature command will result in errors. A software
* reset leaves the timing registers intact,
* but resets the drives.
*/
#if 0
if ((dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20267) ||
(dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20265) ||
(dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20263) ||
(dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20262)) {
unsigned long high_16 = pci_resource_start(dev, 4);
byte udma_speed_flag = inb(high_16 + 0x001f);
outb(udma_speed_flag | 0x10, high_16 + 0x001f);
mdelay(100);
outb(udma_speed_flag & ~0x10, high_16 + 0x001f);
mdelay(2000); /* 2 seconds ?! */
}
#endif
Thoughts? Comments?
Carl-Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-05-26 22:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-26 22:57 drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox