From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>
Cc: "Nguyen, Tom L" <tom.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Saxena,
Sunil" <sunil.saxena@intel.com>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
"Carbonari, Steven" <steven.carbonari@intel.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Proposal to enable MSI support in Linux kernel
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 19:01:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ED53FE3.8090503@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0305281650110.4964-100000@montezuma.mastecende.com>
Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> --- linux-2.5.70-vector/arch/i386/kernel/i8259.c 27 May 2003 02:20:19 -0000 1.1.1.1
> +++ linux-2.5.70-vector/arch/i386/kernel/i8259.c 28 May 2003 04:44:56 -0000
> @@ -427,7 +427,11 @@ void __init init_IRQ(void)
> * us. (some of these will be overridden and become
> * 'special' SMP interrupts)
> */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR
> + for (i = 0; i < (NR_VECTORS - FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR); i++) {
> +#else
> for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
> +#endif
This ifdef isn't necessary. ifdef in a header somewhere. For example,
make NR_IRQS (or some other constant, if changing NR_IRQS definition
isn't ok) condition on the CONFIG_xxx options.
> --- linux-2.5.70-vector/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c 27 May 2003 02:20:19 -0000 1.1.1.1
> +++ linux-2.5.70-vector/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c 28 May 2003 21:36:28 -0000
> @@ -1140,6 +1160,35 @@ next:
> static struct hw_interrupt_type ioapic_level_irq_type;
> static struct hw_interrupt_type ioapic_edge_irq_type;
>
> +#define IOAPIC_AUTO -1
> +#define IOAPIC_EDGE 0
> +#define IOAPIC_LEVEL 1
> +
> +static inline void ioapic_register_intr(int irq, int vector, unsigned long trigger)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR
> + if (!platform_legacy_irq(irq)) {
> + if ((trigger == IOAPIC_AUTO &&
> + IO_APIC_irq_trigger(irq)) ||
> + trigger == IOAPIC_LEVEL)
> + irq_desc[vector].handler = &ioapic_level_irq_type;
> + else
> + irq_desc[vector].handler = &ioapic_edge_irq_type;
> + set_intr_gate(vector, interrupt[vector]);
> +
> + } else
> +#endif
> + {
> + if ((trigger == IOAPIC_AUTO &&
> + IO_APIC_irq_trigger(irq)) ||
> + trigger == IOAPIC_LEVEL)
> + irq_desc[irq].handler = &ioapic_level_irq_type;
> + else
> + irq_desc[irq].handler = &ioapic_edge_irq_type;
> + set_intr_gate(vector, interrupt[irq]);
> + }
> +}
split into two functions, maybe? (due to the ifdef) Your call, it's
mainly a programmer preference.
A bigger question though: if platform_legacy_irq() returns zero, will
the handler _ever_ be edge-triggered?
> @@ -1806,7 +1849,13 @@ static void end_level_ioapic_irq (unsign
> * operation to prevent an edge-triggered interrupt escaping meanwhile.
> * The idea is from Manfred Spraul. --macro
> */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR
> + if (!platform_legacy_irq(irq)) /* it's already the vector */
> + i = irq;
> + else
> +#endif
> i = IO_APIC_VECTOR(irq);
> +
> v = apic_read(APIC_TMR + ((i & ~0x1f) >> 1));
>
> ack_APIC_irq();
> @@ -1890,7 +1939,15 @@ static inline void init_IO_APIC_traps(vo
> * 0x80, because int 0x80 is hm, kind of importantish. ;)
> */
> for (irq = 0; irq < NR_IRQS ; irq++) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR
> + int tmp;
> + tmp = platform_irq(irq);
> + if (tmp == -1)
> + continue;
> + if (IO_APIC_IRQ(tmp) && !IO_APIC_VECTOR(tmp)) {
> +#else
> if (IO_APIC_IRQ(irq) && !IO_APIC_VECTOR(irq)) {
> +#endif
> /*
> * Hmm.. We don't have an entry for this,
> * so default to an old-fashioned 8259
As I see more and more of these ifdefs, I wonder if they couldn't be
hidden inside wrappers?
> --- linux-2.5.70-vector/arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c 27 May 2003 02:20:19 -0000 1.1.1.1
> +++ linux-2.5.70-vector/arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c 28 May 2003 04:44:56 -0000
> @@ -1125,6 +1125,11 @@ void __init mp_parse_prt (void)
> if ((1<<bit) & mp_ioapic_routing[ioapic].pin_programmed[idx]) {
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "Pin %d-%d already programmed\n",
> mp_ioapic_routing[ioapic].apic_id, ioapic_pin);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR
> + if (!platform_legacy_irq(irq))
> + entry->irq = IO_APIC_VECTOR(irq);
> + else
> +#endif
> entry->irq = irq;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -1132,6 +1137,11 @@ void __init mp_parse_prt (void)
> mp_ioapic_routing[ioapic].pin_programmed[idx] |= (1<<bit);
>
> if (!io_apic_set_pci_routing(ioapic, ioapic_pin, irq))
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR
> + if (!platform_legacy_irq(irq))
> + entry->irq = IO_APIC_VECTOR(irq);
> + else
> +#endif
> entry->irq = irq;
>
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "%02x:%02x:%02x[%c] -> %d-%d -> IRQ %d\n",
> Index: linux-2.5.70-vector/arch/i386/pci/irq.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /build/cvsroot/linux-2.5.70/arch/i386/pci/irq.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
> diff -u -p -B -r1.1.1.1 irq.c
> --- linux-2.5.70-vector/arch/i386/pci/irq.c 27 May 2003 02:20:20 -0000 1.1.1.1
> +++ linux-2.5.70-vector/arch/i386/pci/irq.c 28 May 2003 04:44:56 -0000
> @@ -742,6 +742,11 @@ static void __init pcibios_fixup_irqs(vo
> bridge->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(bridge->devfn), pin, irq);
> }
> if (irq >= 0) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR
> + if (!platform_legacy_irq(irq))
> + irq = IO_APIC_VECTOR(irq);
> +#endif
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-28 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-19 21:22 RFC Proposal to enable MSI support in Linux kernel Nguyen, Tom L
2003-05-20 10:36 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-05-20 18:49 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-28 22:22 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-28 23:01 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-05-28 23:06 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-28 23:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-28 23:50 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-30 14:56 Nicolas Mailhot
2003-05-31 2:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-31 7:13 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-31 7:28 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-30 2:14 Nakajima, Jun
2003-05-29 18:12 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-05-29 21:55 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-20 19:03 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-05-19 21:46 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-05-14 20:43 Nakajima, Jun
2003-05-14 19:57 Nakajima, Jun
2003-05-14 19:54 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-14 18:51 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-05-14 15:41 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-05-14 15:22 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-05-14 17:44 ` Greg KH
2003-05-14 18:58 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-14 19:06 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ED53FE3.8090503@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steven.carbonari@intel.com \
--cc=sunil.saxena@intel.com \
--cc=tom.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox